LUGDF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

DynaResource has a net margin of 43.08% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of 4.39%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 47.29% beat DynaResource's return on equity of -45.45%.

Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.26%. On the other hand DynaResource has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lundin Gold has higher upside potential than DynaResource, analysts believe Lundin Gold is more attractive than DynaResource.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 0.666, which suggesting that the stock is 33.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DynaResource has a beta of 0.498, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.172%.

Lundin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. DynaResource offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold pays 33.76% of its earnings as a dividend. DynaResource pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold quarterly revenues are $356.3M, which are larger than DynaResource quarterly revenues of $13.7M. Lundin Gold's net income of $153.5M is higher than DynaResource's net income of $601.4K. Notably, Lundin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.22x while DynaResource's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold is 9.38x versus 0.87x for DynaResource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of 43.08% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of -3.72%. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 47.29% beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 5.71%.

Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.26%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 56.79%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than Lundin Gold, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than Lundin Gold.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 0.666, which suggesting that the stock is 33.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.469%.

Lundin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Lundin Gold pays 33.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 41.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold quarterly revenues are $356.3M, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Lundin Gold's net income of $153.5M is higher than Flexible Solutions International's net income of -$277.7K. Notably, Lundin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.22x while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 31.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold is 9.38x versus 2.00x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 43.08% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of --. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 47.29% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.26%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 102.69%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Lundin Gold, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Lundin Gold.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 0.666, which suggesting that the stock is 33.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

Lundin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold pays 33.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold quarterly revenues are $356.3M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold's net income of $153.5M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Lundin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.22x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold is 9.38x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 43.08% compared to Lundin Gold's net margin of --. Lundin Gold's return on equity of 47.29% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Lundin Gold has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -64.26%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 127.27%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Lundin Gold, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Lundin Gold.

Lundin Gold has a beta of 0.666, which suggesting that the stock is 33.416% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

Lundin Gold has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.24%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lundin Gold pays 33.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lundin Gold's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lundin Gold quarterly revenues are $356.3M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Lundin Gold's net income of $153.5M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Lundin Gold's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.22x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lundin Gold is 9.38x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.